Search Results for "Pathway"

127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Possession. Plaintiff's Title Based on Registered Sale Deed and Long-Standing Possession Prevails Over Defendant's Claim of Adverse Possession.

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiff, N. Natarajan, and the defendants, A. David (appellant) and A. Dennis. The plaintiff filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Lands and Common Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, A. Devadass, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachments on Public Pathway. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Statutory Authority to Act on Petitioner's Complaint Regarding Government Poromboke Road.

The petitioner, P. Maheswari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondents, inclu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachments on Public Pathway — Mandamus Issued Under Article 226. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty.

The petitioner, Dravidaselvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Removal in Public Interest. Writ of Mandamus issued to consider representation within three months, as non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Andiyappan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Pathway Encroachment — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Balachandran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, N.G. Seenivasan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...