Search Results for "Ossification test"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Testimony Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Prakash s/o Bhairuram Dhari, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nagpur in Special Child Cri. Case No. 37/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and POCSO Offences, Upholding Ten-Year Sentence. Age of Victim Proved Through School Records; Consent of Minor Held Immaterial Under POCSO Act.

The judgment dealt with a criminal appeal preferred by the accused against his conviction and sentence for sexual offences against a minor under the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.

The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Penetration.

The appellant, Momin Mazhar alias Babbu, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju Vishwanath Sable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 25.10.2018 in Special Case (POCSO) No. 46 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 2012. Appeal Challenges Conviction for Rape, Kidnapping, and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Girl Under IPC Sections 376, 366A, 506(2).

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 410 of 2010, convicting the appellant/accused no.1 und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant under POCSO Act for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor. Evidence of 13-year-old prosecutrix found credible and corroborated by medical evidence; sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment upheld.

The appellant, Aaditya @ Sadanand Dilip Parab, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Section 4 of the...