Search Results for "Order XXI Rule 105"

118 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Passes Judgment on Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award under Sections 47-49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute arose from Share Subscription Agreement and Put Option Deed involving investment exit rights.

The petitioner, Banyan Tree Growth Capital L.L.C., a Mauritian investment fund, had invested approximately USD 7.5 million in Axiom Cordages Limited, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petitions Challenging Two IPL Franchise Arbitration Awards. Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Payment of Rs.384.83 Crore and Return of Rs.153.34 Crore Bank Guarantee with 18% Interest, Which the Franchisor Contested on Jurisdictional and Merits Grounds.

The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreements between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Kochi fra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.

The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay examines Official Liquidator’s report for declaration of sub-lease executed by lessee as void. The matter involves sub-lease of company property during pendency of winding up, with allegations of fabricated documents.

The matter concerns an Official Liquidator’s report filed in the winding up of Modi Stone Limited, seeking a declaration that a sub-lease dated 20 M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Winding-Up Petitions Under Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Company Court Has Discretion to Appoint Provisional Liquidator and That Appeal Against Admission Order Is Not Maintainable Under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of appeals filed by Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Company Court admitting winding-up petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...