High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "Net Wealth"
125 result(s) found
Found 125 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Tax Appeals in Income Tax Reassessment and Expenditure Disallowance Cases. Reassessment notices under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were valid, and expenditure on renovation and interest on borrowed capital for acquiring a capital asset were not allowable deductions.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves a batch of petitions and appeals arising from income tax proceedings concerning the Travel & Tourism Association of Goa and seve...
- 203
High Court
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.
11 Mar 2005The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...
- 200
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates First Appeal Against Dismissal of Partition Suit as Not Maintainable. The appeal questioned whether a daughter could claim coparcenary rights under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, when prior partition deeds existed and the devolution of property was governed by succession under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, rather than by survivorship.
22 Oct 2024The first appeal arose from the judgment dated 05.07.2016 in O.S.No.6285/2008 passed by the XXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru...
- 31
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.
11 Apr 1969The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...
- 43
High Court
Madras High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Disproportionate Assets. Appellants Challenged Conviction on Grounds of Procedural Irregularities and Erroneous Calculation of Assets.
1 Jul 2026The criminal appeal before the Madras High Court arises from a conviction by the Special Judge for CBI Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.
5 Feb 2016Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Interim Maintenance Application in Family Court Appeal, Dismisses Husband's Stay Application. Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right and wife's employment does not automatically disentitle maintenance if her income is insufficient.
21 Dec 2023The case involves two interim applications in a Family Court Appeal. The wife, Purvi Mukesh Gada, filed an application (IA/16733/2023) seeking interim...
- 181
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 320
