Search Results for "Master Facility Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Master Facility Agreement"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.

1 Aug 2026

The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. Court holds that the Prudential Framework dated June 7, 2019, requires lenders to convene a review meeting within 30 days of default to decide on a resolution plan.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. The court held that the RBI circular dated June 7, 2019, is binding on banks and that the borrower has a right to seek a review meeting under the framework.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Interest Award Under MSMED Act. Court held that remedy under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is optional, not exclusive, and ad hoc arbitration permissible, with interest under Section 16 MSMED Act upheld.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract for supply of VRLA batteries between Petitioner, a government enterprise, and Respondent, a company registered under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Procurement Dispute — Government Department Cannot Unilaterally Rescind Contract After L1 Bidder Declared. The court held that the existence of an arbitration clause in tender documents is sufficient for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving the issue of contract formation to the arbitrator.

10 Dec 2018

The applicant, Jaina Marketing & Associates, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Government Resolution on Teacher Transfers in Maharashtra. Transfer Policy Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioners, comprising various teachers' unions and individual teachers, filed writ petitions challenging the Government Resolution (GR) dated 30...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against Respondent — Disputed Debt and Bona Fide Defence Preclude Admission. The court held that a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be admitted when the debt is bona fide disputed and the company has a substantial defence, as the remedy is not for recovery of debt but for insolvency.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioner,  filed two winding up petitions under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Respondent., seeking winding up on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Leave and License Dispute — Petitioner's Breach of Agreement Upheld. Arbitrator's Award of Rs. 90 Lakhs Damages with Interest Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Ropa Plastics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Court Receiver in Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Loan Default. Loan Agreement Default Leads to Appointment of Receiver to Secure Claim Pending Arbitration.

1 Apr 2013

The petitioner, L & T Finance Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Court R...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)