Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in Dispute Over Exhausted FSI and Conveyance Rights. Prima Facie, Developer's Attempt to Use TDR for Further Construction on Sector IV-A After Exhausting Consumable FSI Violates Cooperative Housing Societies' Right to Conveyance.

The Bombay High Court dealt with cross-appeals arising from an interim injunction granted in a suit filed by cooperative housing societies against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...