Search Results for "Maharashtra Forest Rules"

420 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to CAT Order Directing Reconsideration of Induction into Indian Forest Service. Delay in Cadre Review Does Not Extinguish Right of State Forest Officer to Be Considered for Induction Under Regulation 5(3) of IFS (Cadre) Regulations, 1966.

The State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 9 October 2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Tendu Leaves Contractors Association for Exemption from TCS under Section 206C(1A) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Contractors engaged in trading of forest produce are not liable to tax collection at source as they are not 'buyers' under the provision.

The petitioner, Gondia Beedi Leaves Contractors Association, representing contractors of Tendu leaves (a forest produce), filed a writ petition before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Timber Purchasers for Fire-Destroyed Goods. Property in Timber Not Passed to Purchasers Under Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Hence No Liability Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, fifteen timber merchants, participated in an auction conducted by the Forest Department on 16.04.2008 and 15.05.2008 for the purchase...