Search Results for "MSME facilitation council"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MSME facilitation council"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Continuation of Arbitration Proceedings After Amalgamation of Multi-State Cooperative Society into Non-Cooperative Entity. The court held that Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not apply to arbitrations under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, and that arbitration proceedings survive amalgamation.

20 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Emerald Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Dewan Realtors Pvt. Ltd. challenging the continuation of arbitration ...

High Court

High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Execution of MSME Arbitral Award on Grounds of Fraud. Court Considers Whether Execution Proceedings Can Be Quashed When Award Was Not Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Despite Participation in Arbitration.

1 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited, floated a tender for supply of drugs and disposable delivery kits. The responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award for Unpaid Design and Construction Works in Section 34 Challenge Brought by Award Debtor. The Court held that the arbitral tribunal's error concerning joint and several liability of Designated Partners under the group company doctrine was severable and did not affect the efficacy of the award for admitted outstanding dues under an agreement containing an arbitration clause.

30 Sep 2025

This matter arose from a commercial arbitration petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration Petition to District Court Nashik Under Section 42 of Arbitration Act — Prior Section 9 Petition Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction. The court held that the District Court at Nashik, having first entertained a Section 9 petition, has exclusive jurisdiction over all subsequent applications, including a Section 34 petition, despite a later Section 11 application before the High Court.

15 May 2020

The case involves a dispute between Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant/petitioner) and the Union of India (the respondent) arising from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time for Arbitration in Infrastructure Dispute Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Grants Six Months Extension for Completion of Pending Arbitration Proceedings with Consent of Both Parties.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner's Application for Appointment of Retired District Judge as Sole Arbitrator Granted Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Notice.

16 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s Bafna Udyog, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Purchase Orders. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement, as Parties Acted on Purchase Orders Containing Arbitration Clause.

16 Jan 2023

The applicant, Bajaj Electricals Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitrator Appointment in BPCL Dispute — No Bias Found in Sole Arbitrator Being an Employee of the Respondent Company. The court held that mere employment does not create automatic disqualification under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and petitioners failed to show actual bias.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns five arbitration petitions filed by different companies (Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Wires Limited Ltd., Universa...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)