Search Results for "Lokayukta investigation"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Karnataka Lokayukta Challenging KSAT Order Setting Aside Charge Memo. Enquiry Officer's Report Exonerating Employee of Misappropriation Upheld as Petition Withdrawn.

The Karnataka Lokayukta filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Petitioner's disproportionate assets case quashed as investigation commenced without mandatory prior sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhar Eligar, a Superintending Engineer in the PWD Department, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Government Officers Challenging Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Grant Hearing Under Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta Act, 1971 Renders Report Unsustainable.

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disciplinary Inquiry Despite Non-Filing of Charge Sheet in Criminal Case. Non-filing of charge sheet by police does not preclude disciplinary proceedings against a government servant on same allegations.

The petitioner, a Commercial Tax Officer, challenged the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dismissing his application to set aside a repo...