Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

534 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.

23 Jan 2013

The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

12 Sep 2019

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Selected Driver Trainees Against NWKRTC, Holding They Are Not Workmen Under Industrial Disputes Act. Court Rules That Selected Candidates Undergoing Training Without Appointment Order or Remuneration Do Not Attain Status of Workman Under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope of Incidental Issues in Computation of Benefits. The court held that the Labour Court can decide incidental issues such as interpretation of settlements when computing benefits under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the workman's right to continuity of service had been established.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Force Motors Ltd., challenged an order of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted ce...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petition for Regularization of Daily Wage Employees Under Panchayat Raj Engineering Division. The Court Examined Whether Employees Appointed Against Sanctioned Vacant Posts and Completing 10 Years of Service Are Entitled to Regularization in Light of Government Circulars and Supreme Court Precedent.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioners, daily wage employees in the Panchayat Raj Engineering Division, filed a writ petition seeking regularization of their services from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

30 Aug 2006

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Upholds Award of Rs.3,12,940/- with 12% Interest for Death of Lineman in Course of Employment. The court held that the death of a permanent lineman arose out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the employer failed to prove otherwise.

20 Mar 2018

The case involves an appeal filed by the Executive Engineer of Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM) against an order dated 29.05.2013 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Ex Gratia Payment Under Section 7(2)(xiv) of Maharashtra Mathadi Act Does Not Bar Workmen's Compensation Claim. The court interpreted Section 16 of the 1977 Act as not precluding a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, since ex gratia payment is not compensation under the 1923 Act.

19 Aug 2019

The case involves a reference by a Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court on the question whether an employee who has received ex gra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages for Illegal Termination. Services Rendered at Different Units of Same Employer Counted Together for Computing 240 Days Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, challenged an award of the First Labour Court, Nagpur, which directed reinstatemen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Rejection of Industrial Dispute Under Section 10(4-A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Labour Court Failed to Adjudicate Issues Framed Regarding Fairness of Domestic Enquiry and Sustainability of Dismissal Order, Leading to Remand.

27 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Shri V. Ramachandrappa, a workman employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), was dismissed from service by an...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)