Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Hotel Management Dispute. The court set aside the trial court's order and remanded for fresh consideration, holding that the appellant had made out a prima facie case for interim relief.

14 Nov 2024

The appellant, Royal Orchid Associated Hotels Private Limited, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.

15 Apr 2024

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Loan Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Dispute Over Unpaid Loan Amount of Rs. 1,50,00,000.

28 Jul 2023

The applicant, Aditya Birla Finance Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arising from Work Contract for Construction of Canal. Clause 30.1 of General Conditions Constitutes an Arbitration Agreement and Disputes Are Not Excepted Matters.

13 Aug 2021

The petitioner, M/s F.A. Enterprise, a registered partnership firm, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 25 Arbitration Invoked. The court appointed a former Judge of this Court as the sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes between the parties under the Joint Development Agreement dated 30.03.2009.

27 Aug 2018

The petitioner, M/s Township Promoters, a registered partnership firm, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Section 11 Petition After Nine-Year Delay. Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed in 2008, finally disposed with appointment of sole arbitrator.

26 Oct 2017

The petitioner, N.K. Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on 12.08.2008, seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Orders in Arbitration Reference Dispute — Agreement Contained Arbitration Clause, Civil Suit Not Maintainable. Section 8(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Mandates Reference to Arbitration When Party to Agreement Invokes It Before First Statement on Substance of Dispute.

11 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Rashmi Solanki, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Senior C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Clause in Reconstitution Deed Upheld. The court found that the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contained an arbitration clause, and thus appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the partners.

20 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Shri Prabhakar Reddy, a founder partner of M/s. Classic Enterprises, filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Mysore Minerals Limited in Arbitration Challenge — Rejects Reappreciation of Evidence Under Section 34. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract terms is final and not perverse, affirming dismissal of petition to set aside award.

26 Sep 2013

The appellant, Mysore Minerals Limited (MML), a government undertaking engaged in mineral extraction and export, issued a tender notice on 18.5.1995 i...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)