Search Results for "KIAD Act acquisition"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification Under KIAD Act Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to preliminary notification issued in 2009 dismissed as writ petition filed in 2022 is grossly delayed without explanation.

The petitioner, H.S. Abdul Riyaz Basha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund Against Lease Forfeiture by West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation. Mortgagee Cannot Claim Rights Superior to Lessee When Lease Has Been Validly Terminated.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which dismissed the appeal of the Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund (SASF) against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Officer's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs.5,75,000 to Rs.8,00,000 per Acre Based on Comparable Sale Deed.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for the Upper Krishna Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged.

The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Surplus Airport Land to Private Parties. Court holds that acquisition under KIAD Act is for planned development and surplus land need not be returned to original owners.

The petitioners, including an RTI activist and agriculturists, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Karnataka High Court challenging the allo...