Search Results for "IPC 167"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of 8-Year-Old Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded for the rape of an 8-year-old girl unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in SFIO Case — Remand Orders Valid Despite Cognizance Issue. Court holds that remand orders under Section 167 Cr.P.C. are independent of cognizance and not subject to challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after filing of complaint.

The applicant, Hari Sankaran, was arrested by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) on 1 April 2019 for an offence punishable under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is not defeated by subsequent inclusion of MCOCA offences after the expiry of the statutory period.

The appellants were arrested on 31.05.2021 in connection with Crime No.509/2021 for offences under Sections 302, 201, 120-B, 364, 212 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail Without Deposit Condition in Section 420 IPC Case. Indefeasible Right Under Section 167(2) CrPC Cannot Be Subject to Monetary Conditions Based on Earlier Regular Bail Undertaking.

The appellant was arrested on 31.01.2020 for offences under Section 420 IPC in Crime No.31 of 2019. He was initially granted regular bail by the Magis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC for Failure to Pass Specific Remand Extension Order. Mandatory Production of Accused and Specific Order Required for Valid Extension of Police Custody Remand.

The petitioner, Parshuram s/o Bajirao Dongre, was arrested on 23.7.2017 in connection with Crime No. 85/2017 registered at Aheri Police Station, Gadch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under Section 167(2) CrPC Due to Investigation Delay. Statutory Right to Default Bail Cannot Be Denied Even When Investigation Under MCOCA Is Pending, as Charge Sheet Was Filed After the Application for Default Bail.

The petitioner, Pankaj Sundarlal Yadav, was accused No.7 in Crime No.113/2015 registered at Police Station Gondia for offences under Section 302 read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Statutory Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. for Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within Prescribed Period in NDPS Case. The right to default bail accrues upon expiry of 60 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet before bail application is decided.

The petitioner, Sri Saleem, was arrested on 01.04.2015 in Crime No.144/2015 for offences under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Couple for Causing Death by Negligent Act in Child Dispute. Appellants convicted under Section 304-II read with Section 34 IPC for causing death of a woman by pushing her into a gutter after a quarrel over children's fight.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Mirabai and Sakharam Patil under Section 304-II read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (I...