Search Results for "IPC 153-A"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Segregation of Trial for MLA Accused in Communal Violence Cases — High Court Order Quashed. Trial Court directed to file separate charge sheet and conduct separate trial for appellant under Section 528 BNSS, 2023.

The appellant, Mamman Khan, a sitting MLA from Ferozepur Jhirka constituency in Haryana, was arrayed as an accused in FIR Nos.149 and 150 both dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under UAPA and IPC for Terrorist Conspiracy and Murder. Conspiracy to Kill Rationalist Activist Proved Through Circumstantial Evidence and Confession of Co-Accused.

The appellant, Mirza Himayat Beig @ Umar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in UAPA Case Against High Court Remand Order. High Court's Setting Aside of Discharge and Remand for Fresh Hearing on Framing of Charge Under Sections 120B, 124A, 153A, 153B IPC and Sections 18, 39 UAPA Does Not Warrant Interference at Special Leave Stage.

The dispute arose from a criminal case involving allegations under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against MCOCA Charges in Robbery Case — Appellant Fails to Show Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Organized Crime. Court upholds trial court's rejection of discharge, finding sufficient material to proceed under MCOCA for dacoity and robbery offences.

The appellant, Maruti Navnath Sonawane, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Special Judge for MCOCA at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Default Bail in UAP Act Case — Extension of Remand Lacked Specific Reasons Under Section 43D(2)(b). High Court's Grant of Statutory Bail Upheld as Special Court's Satisfaction Was Not Based on Valid Grounds for Further Detention.

The case arose from a murder and subsequent violence in Coimbatore in September 2016. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over investigation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Grant of Default Bail Under UAPA — Right to Default Bail Accrues on Expiry of 90 Days from First Remand, Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet Does Not Defeat Right.

The Union of India filed writ appeals against an order of a learned Single Judge granting default bail to the respondents under Section 167(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge Application in Dowry Death Case. Dying Declaration and Presumption Under Section 113-B of Evidence Act Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The present criminal revision application was filed by Appasaheb @ Eknath Nago Salunke, the husband of the deceased Kirti, challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Unlawful Activities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. Applicants Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC as Allegations of Waging War Against Government and Unlawful Activities Not Substantiated.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory ba...