Search Results for "Hill Station Development"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners' Challenge to Section 6(1) Notification Fails Due to Delay, Laches, and Existence of Alternative Remedy.

The petitioners, who are residents and agriculturists of Mahalunge, Taluka-Mulshi, District Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order Directing Undertaking Against Alienation of Property. Arbitration Petition Filed Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Order Under Section 17 in a Long-Pending Development Dispute.

The Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed challenging the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 17993 OF 2023

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...