Search Results for "Forest Range Officer"

214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Karnataka Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of forest produce beyond reasonable doubt.

The revision petitioner, Pramod S/o Arjun Kanakupakar, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Dandeli in C.C.No.735/2010 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement in Forest Department Termination Case — Workman Entitled to Reinstatement Despite Procedural Lapses as Termination Violated Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioners, the Chief Conservator of Forest, Zilla Panchayat, Deputy Conservator of Forest, and Range Forest Officer, Kalaburagi, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Forest Officers Against Injunction in Forest Rights Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Forest Rights Under Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the original defendant nos. 2 and 3 (applicants herein) against the order of the trial court grant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...