Search Results for "Equitable recovery"

831 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 831 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay in Ordnance Factory Case. Recovery of Excess Amount Paid Due to Employer's Mistake Held Impermissible When Employees Are in Same or Higher Pay Scale and No Misrepresentation Is Involved.

The petitioners, employees of Ordnance Factory Bhandara, were granted a higher pay scale by the employer. Subsequently, the employer sought to recover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Pensionary Benefits from Retired Class III Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Rs.77,446/- directed after 17 years of pay fixation without misrepresentation by employee held unsustainable.

The petitioner, Devidas Marotirao Kandhare, a retired junior clerk (Class III) under the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee; Directs Pension Refixation and Payment of Benefits with Interest. Recovery impermissible as excess payment made for over five years and employee belongs to Class III, applying principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Gendlal Dharkar, was initially appointed as a Tracer in Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran on 27/09/1991. Over the years, he received a ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate Satisfaction Orders in Cooperative Bank Dispute. Special Recovery Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on validity of recovery certificates or order refund under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, M/s. Vilas Transport Co., a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Bank Appeal, Holds Guarantors Liable for Loan Recovery; Trial Court's Dismissal Against Guarantors Reversed. Equitable Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Valid and Suit Within Limitation as Guarantors Agreed to be Bound by Principal Borrower's Acknowledgment.

The dispute arose from a loan recovery suit filed by Allahabad Bank against the principal borrower and six guarantors. The bank had sanctioned a loan ...