Search Results for "Electricity Distribution Company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Electricity Distribution Company"

573 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 573 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee’s Appeal Against Direct Electricity Supply by Board. Board’s Action Upheld as Comparison of Maximum Demand Under Section 19(1)(b)(ii) of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 Required Assessment of Actual Supply, Not Generating Capacity.

29 Jan 1969

The appellant, Sihor Electricity Works Ltd., held a licence under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 for generation and distribution of electrical energ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Oct 2015

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cheque Dishonour Fee Imposed by Electricity Company — Levy Without Statutory Authority or Contractual Basis is Unlawful. The court held that the respondents were not entitled to levy a cheque dishonour fee under Regulation 29.05(d) of the Electricity Supply and Distribution Code, 2001, as the petitioner had paid the entire arrears by a pay order before the due date.

26 Nov 2014

The petitioner, M/s Kanoria Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was an industrial consumer of electricity suppli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.

8 Jan 2020

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Distribution Company's Appeal in Electricity Act Case Over Tariff Dispute. The Court upheld the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's order altering the tariff for inadvertent drawal from temporary to regular supply under open access regulations, affirming regulatory authority under Sections 42 and 181 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

17 Feb 2022

The appeal was filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (AVVNL), a distribution company, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

4 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute, Interpreting Limitation Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) bars recovery of additional charges from the date the sum first became due, based on billing error, and remanded the case for fresh consideration.

5 Oct 2021

The dispute arose when the appellant, a cotton yarn manufacturer in Panipat, Haryana, received a short assessment notice from the electricity distribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Multi Year Tariff Regulations by Electricity Distribution Company — Procedural Compliance Upheld. Court holds that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission substantially complied with the requirement of previous publication under Section 181(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Conduct of Business Regulations, 2004.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the Multi Year Tariff Regulations, 2011 framed by the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Appellate Order in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Disconnection of Electricity Supply Without Proof of Theft or Tampering Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 Held Illegal.

3 Mar 2026

The present petition was filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd and another (the petitioners) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challe...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)