Search Results for "Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Violation of Statutory Right Under Section 25(4) — Delay in Filing Complaint After Expiry of Shelf Life Deprives Accused of Right to Get Sample Tested from Central Drugs Laboratory.

The petitioners, a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, were accused in a criminal complaint filed by the Drug Inspector under the Drug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Drug Manufacturers in Challenge to Suspension of Licenses for Alleged Spurious Drugs. Suspension order set aside for violation of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before suspension under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The petitioners, National Pharmaceuticals and AVEO Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd, are drug manufacturing companies holding licenses to manufacture drugs at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes License Suspension in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Procedural Violation in Inspection and Appeal. Failure to Provide Inspection Report and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Suspension Order Unsustainable Under Rule 66(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

The petitioner, M/s. Raj Pharma, a partnership firm holding a valid drug license under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules, 1945, challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Prosecution for Alleged Violation of Sections 18(a)(i) and 17B(d) Held Invalid Without Prior Sanction.

The petitioners, including a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, challenged the criminal proceedings initiated against them in Spl.CC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Sleeping Partner and Employees in Drugs Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Showing That Accused Was In Charge of Business Under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The Bombay High Court dealt with an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of Criminal Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Recognition of L.C.E.H. Qualification for Allopathic Practice. L.C.E.H. is a Homoeopathy Qualification and Does Not Entitle Holders to Practice Modern Scientific System of Medicine.

The petitioners, LCEH Doctors' Association and two individual doctors holding L.C.E.H. (Licentiate of Court of Examiners in Homoeopathy) qualification...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Test Reports Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act in NDPS Prosecution. Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under that Act, not to samples collected under NDPS Act, 1985.

The petitioner, M/s. Kamud Drugs Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.2, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Pass Book Scheme Benefits for Pharmaceutical Exports. Exports of Ampicillin and Tetracycline Capsules Held Not Covered Under Pass Book Scheme as They Were Not Manufactured by the Petitioner Itself.

The petitioners, Neon Laboratories Limited and its director, challenged an order dated 12th May 1999 passed by the Joint Director General of Foreign T...