Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Test Reports Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act in NDPS Prosecution. Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under that Act, not to samples collected under NDPS Act, 1985.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Kamud Drugs Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.2, the Central Excise Department, to provide test reports of samples collected from the petitioner company. The petitioner founded this relief on Section 25(2) and (3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. However, the petition did not state that the samples were collected by an 'Inspector' under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. It was common ground that the petitioner was facing prosecution under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and the samples were collected in connection with that offence. The panchnama annexed to the petition indicated that the search and seizure was done under Section 41(2) of the NDPS Act. The court examined whether the petitioner could insist on a copy of the Government Analyst's report under Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. It noted that Section 25(2) applies only to samples collected by an Inspector under Chapter IV of that Act. Since the samples were collected under the NDPS Act, the requirement of Section 25(2) was not attracted. The petitioner's argument that Section 80 of the NDPS Act, which provides that the Act is in addition to and not in derogation of other laws, would import Section 25(2) into NDPS proceedings was rejected. The court held that Section 80 does not override the condition that the sample must be collected by an Inspector under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Drugs and Cosmetics Act - Section 25(2) - Right to Copy of Report - Samples collected under NDPS Act - The petitioner sought a writ to direct respondent No.2 to provide test reports under Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The court held that Section 25(2) applies only to samples collected by an Inspector under Chapter IV of that Act. Since the samples were collected under Section 41(2) of the NDPS Act, 1985, the petitioner was not entitled to the report under Section 25(2). The petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-4)

B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 80 - Application of other laws not barred - The petitioner argued that Section 80 of the NDPS Act, 1985 requires observance of Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The court rejected this, noting that Section 80 does not override the condition that samples must be collected by an Inspector under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a copy of the Government Analyst's report under Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 in respect of samples collected in connection with a prosecution under the NDPS Act, 1985.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act
  • 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under Chapter IV of that Act
  • Section 80 of NDPS Act
  • 1985 does not import Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act
  • 1940 into NDPS proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (07) 188

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1708 of 2012

2012-07-04

A.M. Khanwilkar, A.R. Joshi

2012:BHC-AS:14002-DB

Subhash Jha, Swapnil Ambure, Dinesh Tiwari (for Petitioner), U.V. Kejariwal (APP for State), Francis Saldanha (Spl.P.P. for UOI)

M/s. Kamud Drugs Pvt. Ltd.

State of Maharashtra, Central Excise Department

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking direction to provide test reports of samples collected from petitioner company.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ directing respondent No.2 to provide test reports under Section 25(2) and (3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed entitlement to a copy of the Government Analyst's report under Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a copy of the Government Analyst's report under Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 in respect of samples collected in connection with a prosecution under the NDPS Act, 1985.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Section 80 of the NDPS Act, 1985 requires observance of Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Respondent No.2 submitted that the copy of the Government Analyst's report was part of the complaint and already furnished to the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 25(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by an Inspector under Chapter IV of that Act. Since the samples in question were collected under Section 41(2) of the NDPS Act, 1985, the petitioner is not entitled to a copy of the Government Analyst's report under Section 25(2). Section 80 of the NDPS Act does not import Section 25(2) into NDPS proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The requirement of furnishing one copy of the report of the Government Analyst to a person from whom the sample is collected under Section 25(2), is in respect of the samples collected in exercise of the powers under ChapterIV of the Act of 1940. As no case is made out in the petition in that behalf, the question of issuing writ directing respondent No.2 to furnish one copy of the Government Analyst report to the petitioner does not arise.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1708 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to provide test reports. The petition was heard and dismissed on 4 July 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940: 25(2), 25(3), 23(4), 23
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 41(2), 80
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Test Reports Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act in NDPS Prosecution. Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under that Act, not to samples collected under ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Goregaon Sports Club Case — Club Promoting Sports Held Charitable Under Section 2(15) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Principle of Mutuality Not Applicable as Facilities Open to General Public Without Restrict...