Search Results for "Dividend Income"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Depreciation on Original Cost in Amalgamation Case Under Rule 10 of Income Tax Rules. Notional Depreciation to Non-Resident Parent Does Not Reduce Written Down Value for Successor Company.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the assessment years 1976-77, 1977-78, and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Stay on Tax Recovery in Gift of Shares Case Under Section 56(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court allows stay of recovery pending appeal, subject to conditions protecting revenue, without deciding merits of taxability of gift of shares.

The petitioner, M/s. Nerka Chemicals Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Demuric Holdings Private Limited (DHPL), challenged an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Change of Opinion. Reassessment Notice and Order Quashed as Assessing Officer Had No Fresh Tangible Material to Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Aroni Commercials Limited, challenged a notice dated 28 March 2013 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09 Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts and Change of Opinion. Remuneration Paid to Directors Was Fully Disclosed and Examined During Original Assessment, So Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. OHM Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, challenged notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Interim Maintenance Order — Income Tax Returns Not Conclusive for Maintenance. Court Holds That Net Taxable Income Is Not the Sole Basis for Determining Maintenance Under Matrimonial Law.

The petitioner husband challenged the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance of Rs.20,000 to his wife and Rs.10,000 each to their two sons....