Search Results for "Directive Violation"

426 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions of Motor Transport Workers Act. Provisions Permitting Extended Hours and Spread Over Upheld as Reasonable and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved representative union for employees of Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Undertaking (BE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions in Motor Transport Workers Act. Court upholds sections 13 and 16 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 as constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved and representative union for employees in the transport section of Brihanmumbai Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging BCAS Security Directive for Airport Access — Directive Issued in Public Interest for Aviation Security, Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory.

The petitioners, Narangs International Hotels Private Limited and its Managing Director, challenged a directive issued by the Bureau of Civil Aviation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arguments on Constitutional Validity of Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1984 — Matter Remains Undecided in Provided Text. Petitioner Contended Act Lacked Nexus with Directive Principles and Was Not Protected Under Article 31C.

The petitioners, M/s Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of the Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.

The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...