Search Results for "DRAT"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "DRAT"

102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order as Time-Barred Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Filing Securitisation Application is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended by the Tribunal.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Zen Lifecare Ltd., challenged the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad, dated 20th November 2020 and 6th February 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Set Aside the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal’s (DRAT) Order — Directs DRAT to Decide Appeals on Merits. Revisiting the Scope of Appellate Authority and Jurisdiction — Emphasis on Avoiding Routine Remands — Upholding Judicial Efficiency and Finality of Decisions

20 Feb 2025

The DRAT, as an appellate authority, has the duty to decide all issues based on the material available on record. Routine and unjustified remands del...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Retired Partners in Debt Recovery Case Upholding DRT and DRAT Orders. Retired Partners Remain Liable for Original Bank Loan as Bank Did Not Formally Release Them Despite Reconstitution of Partnership Firm and Execution of Fresh Agreements with New Partners Under Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

16 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by two retired partners of M/s. Srishti Components, a partnership firm, challenging orders of the Debts R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Debt Recovery Case on Limitation Issue - Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 Not Applicable to Appeals Under Section 30 of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The Court held that the legislative intent expressly excludes Section 5, making the 30-day appeal period non-condonable, and overruled the High Court's reliance on an earlier precedent.

24 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a bank against an order of the Recovery Officer under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Insti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Debt Recovery Case with Interim Deposit and Attachment Orders. Court directed appellant to deposit Rs.5 crores, permitted respondent to withdraw amounts, continued attachment of shares, and ordered timely disposal of pending appeal under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

27 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India disposed of a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, which challenged the High Court of Rajasthan's dismissal ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Case for Exceeding Jurisdiction Under Section 18 — Bank's Possession of Secured Asset Upheld Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves a dispute between IDBI Bank Ltd (Petitioner) and Aditya Logistics (I) Pvt. Ltd. and others (Respondents) concerning the enforcement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Pre-Deposit Order Under SARFAESI Act. Pre-deposit of 30% of Amount Due Under Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act is Mandatory and DRAT Has No Discretion to Waive It.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Shree Vindhya Paper Mills Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 4 November 2011, which requir...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)