High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.
17 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "DMC Act"
75 result(s) found
Found 75 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Action to Remove Unauthorized Vertical Extension in Notified Slum. Unauthorized Construction Cannot Be Protected Merely Because It Is Situated in a Slum Area.
3 Mar 2023The appellant, Mujibur Rehman Chaudhary, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay challenging a notice dated 31 December 2019 issued by th...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MCGM to Construct Public Toilet on Reserved Plot, Sets Aside Injunction. Trial Court's Interim Order Restraining Construction of Public Toilet on CTS No. 418 Was Passed Without Considering Statutory Reservation Under MRTP Act and DCR 33.
18 May 2021The case involves an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Defendant No. 1) against an interim injunction granted by the City Civil C...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Water Tanker Operators to Continue Operations Pending License Renewal — Municipal Corporation Cannot Disconnect Water Supply Without Following Natural Justice. The court held that the MCGM's threatened disconnection of water supply without deciding renewal applications and without hearing the licensees was arbitrary and illegal.
16 Mar 2020The petitioners, Harbour Water Suppliers Company Pvt. Ltd. and OK Marine, are water tanker operators who hold licenses from the Municipal Corporation ...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Affidavit-in-Evidence in DV Act Proceedings — Section 28(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Allows Court to Lay Down Its Own Procedure. Husband's Objection to Wife's Affidavit-in-Evidence Rejected as Magistrate's Order Permitting Affidavit-in-Evidence Was Justified to Expedite Proceedings.
22 Mar 2018The petitioner-husband filed a writ petition challenging the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Cantonment, Pune, which permitted t...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds That Proceedings Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Are Civil in Nature and Section 482 CrPC Is Not Applicable. The Court Answered the Reference by Holding That the High Court Cannot Exercise Its Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC in Respect of DV Act Proceedings.
14 Nov 2017The present reference arises out of an order dated 13/2/2015 passed by a learned Single Judge in Criminal Application No.578/2011. During the hearing,...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Pre-deposit Condition for Appeal Under Section 406(2)(e) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — Condition Not Arbitrary or Unreasonable. The provision requiring deposit of disputed tax as precondition for appeal is valid and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.
16 Jan 2014The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 406(2)(e) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corpo...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Maintenance to Second Wife in Bigamous Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 25 Entitles a Woman Whose Marriage is Declared Null and Void to Claim Maintenance Despite Invalidity of Marriage
3 May 2010The case involves an appeal by Mangala Bhivaji Lad (also known as Mangala Dhondiba Aher) against the judgment of the Family Court, Mumbai, which decla...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Proceedings initiated at Sahada Police Station set aside as all alleged incidents occurred within Nashik jurisdiction.
13 Apr 2010The applicants, family members of the husband, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 126/2006 registered at ...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.
16 Sep 2005The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...
- 110
