Search Results for "Cumulative Experience"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020042082025_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder for Gain Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 449, 380 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Chandrasekar, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, for the murder of a woman and for robbery. The prosecution allege...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeal in Summary Suit Under Commercial Courts Act — Order on Summons for Judgment Challenged as 'Judgment' Under Section 13(1A). Transitional Provisions and Assignment Orders Examined for Pending Suits Transferred to Commercial Division.

The Commercial Appeal arose from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in Summons for Judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and lack of corroboration.

The appellants, Gulab, Sunil, Kamal, Amol, and Durgabai, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Case No.65/2017. Gulab a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holds Managing Agents' Group Controlling Over 75% Voting Power Excludes Company from 'Public Interest' Under Section 23A. Partners of Managing Agency Forming a Controlling Group Cannot Be Counted as Public for Purposes of Exemption Under Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, concerning the applicability of Section 23A to a company where the Income-tax Officer sought ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...