Search Results for "Consumer Court"

1572 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1572 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Telecom Service Provider Jurisdiction - Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Does Not Bar Consumer Forums from Adjudicating Disputes with Private Service Providers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The civil appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 26 May 2016, which affirmed the juris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Appointment of Full-Time Presidents for District Consumer Forums in Goa. Failure to appoint full-time Presidents violates the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and defeats its objectives.

The petitioner, Shri Arjun Virnodkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking a direction for the appointment of a full-time...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...