Search Results for "Construction Restriction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Construction Restriction"

1189 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1189 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines

8 Apr 2026

The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

23 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Demolition of Cinema Structure Subject to Defence NOC in Property Dispute. Petitioner's right to redevelop is conditional upon obtaining No Objection Certificate from Defence authorities under Works of Defence Act, 1903 and Cantonment Act, 2006 due to proximity to defence installation.

11 Oct 2023

The Petitioner, Sameer Baijanath Joshi, is the owner of land admeasuring 3,627.90 sq. metres bearing Plot No.9-A, CTS No. 37 and 38A at Village Juhu, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Endorsement and Defence Ministry Letter Restricting Construction Near Defence Establishment — Executive Guidelines Cannot Override Statutory Rights Under Article 300A and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court held that the Works of Defence Act, 1903 occupies the field and any restrictions must be imposed under its provisions, not through executive guidelines.

29 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd. and Merushikhar Infra LLP, owned property in Bangalore. They sought to construct a building and obtained a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition Imposing 90% Backward Class Membership in Redevelopment of PWR 219 Scheme Land — Condition Held Unreasonable and Without Legal Basis Under Article 226. The court struck down the condition as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, finding it arbitrary and lacking statutory foundation, thereby allowing redevelopment without membership composition restrictions.

25 Aug 2021

The petitioners, members of Sangam Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged a condition imposed by the Social Justice and Special Assistance Depar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

8 Dec 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Stop Work Notice and Directions Under Regulation 58 of DCR for Greater Bombay 1991. Dispute Concerns Obligation of Cotton Textile Mill to Hand Over Land for Worker Housing and Open Spaces Immediately After Layout Approval.

11 May 2012

The matter concerned two properties owned by a textile company in Mumbai: a mill at Prabhadevi and Spring Mills at Dadar. The company closed the latte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.

23 Nov 2005

The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

28 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)