Search Results for "Collusive decree"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Pendente Lite Purchasers in Partition Suit Execution — Objections Under Order XXI Rule 97 Barred Due to Lis Pendens. Consent Decree in Appellate Court Not Proved Collusive; Rigors of Section 52 Transfer of Property Act Apply.

The present second appeal arose from execution proceedings in a partition suit that commenced in 1974. The original plaintiff Shankarrao Kanakdande ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Against Restoration of Possession in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Set Aside Without Notice to Decree Holder Violates Natural Justice. Order XXI Rule 99 CPC Application Cannot Be Decided Without Hearing the Decree Holder.

The petitioner, Smt. Leelavathi, filed a civil revision petition under Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964, challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Development Dispute — Plaintiff Allowed to Bring on Record Subsequent Events Including Deed of Conveyance and Alleged Fraudulent Tenancy. Court holds that pre-trial amendments should be liberally allowed to determine real controversy between parties.

The plaintiff, M/s SR Enterprises, filed a Commercial Suit against defendants Gurbachan Kaur Jattinder Singh Chadha and another, arising out of a Deve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Executing Court's Order Refusing to Recall Warrant of Possession Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court's Discretion to Refuse Recall of Warrant After Delivery of Possession Upheld as No Material Irregularity Shown.

The petitioners, original decree holders in Execution Application No. 22/2008, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Order in Final Decree Proceedings for Lack of Jurisdiction — Order on I.A.Nos.15, 16 and 17 in FDP No.2/2008 Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Preliminary Decree and Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners (defendants in the original suit) challenging the order dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Garnishee Order Against Respondent in Execution of Decree — Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets Constitutes Admission of Liability. The Court directed attachment and deposit of Rs. 17,40,82,984/- under Order XXI Rules 46 and 46A CPC, finding no real dispute under Rule 46-C.

The Applicant, Drive India Enterprises Solutions Ltd., is the Judgment Creditor in a decree dated 10th September 2018 against the Judgment Debtor, Hai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) Hears Appeal Against Remand Order Allowing Third Party Challenge to Consent Decree. The Court Examines Whether Section 96(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Bars an Appeal by Strangers to a Consent Decree, and Whether Allegations of Fraud Vitiate the Decree.

The appellant, Vilas Trimbak Sanap, filed a partition suit (RCS No. 499/2014) against his father and brothers (respondent Nos. 4–6) claiming a 1/4th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition in Post-Foreign Award Enforcement Against Guarantor Deleted from Proceedings. Court Examines Applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine to Bind Non-Signatory for Interim Relief.

The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, seeking inte...