Search Results for "Co-accused disclosure"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Chain of Circumstances Incomplete, Extra-Judicial Confession Weak. The court held that suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Devi Lal and Babu Lal, setting aside their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Join Independent Panch Witnesses and Inconsistencies in Seizure and Recovery Cast Doubt on Prosecution Case Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Shaikh Nazir Shaikh Failu, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Drop Witnesses and Array Them as Accused in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case. Court Holds That Power Under Section 319 CrPC Is Discretionary and Cannot Be Invoked by an Accused at Trial Stage Without Evidence.

The applicant, a senior IPS officer and accused No. 2 in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC for Fatal Assault During Altercation.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Rajes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramkishan @ Pintya s/o Asaram Kayande and Ramprasad @ Nana Dattatraya Janjal, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Jalna...