Search Results for "Charge set aside"

11324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Waiver of Pre-Deposit and Setting Aside of DRT Order Under SARFAESI Act; Auction Purchaser Disputes Complete Waiver Under Section 18 and Reversal of DRT's Dismissal of Securitisation Application.

The writ petition was filed by an auction purchaser under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging two orders of the Debt Recovery Appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Framing of Charges in Multiple Cases. Court holds that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case is required and not a detailed evaluation of evidence.

The judgment involves a batch of criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Additional Charge Under POCSO Act in Kidnapping Case — No Sexual Intent Established. Court holds that mere kidnapping without evidence of sexual assault does not attract Section 7 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The petitioner, accused No.1 in S.C.No.227/2018 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, challenged the order dated 31.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in DMER Additional Charge Dispute — Acquiescence and Lack of Legal Right to Additional Charge. Restoration of Additional Charge to Petitioner Upheld as Respondent Failed to Challenge Initial Order for Over Two Years.

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, considered the challenge to a judgment of the Maharashtra Administrat...