Search Results for "Chamar Caste"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Termination Order of Gram Sevak Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action Under Article 14 -- Service Termination Dispute

The petitioner, filed a Special Civil Application challenging her termination from the post of Gram Sevak by District Panchayat Sabarkantha -- She was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Agricultural Field, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 24.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent of Minor Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC, Section 4 of POCSO Act, and Section 3(ii)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mukeshji Ataji Thakor, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO & Atrocity), Gandhinagar, for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder and Atrocity Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Circumstantial Evidence Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 120(B), 114 IPC and Section 3(2)(4) of SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 07.02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses. Execution of Agreement Not Duly Proved Under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, as Attesting Witnesses Were Not Examined.

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.06.2005 filed by the respondent-plaintiff (Ashish Jain) against the...