Search Results for "CIDCO land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CIDCO land"

242 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 242 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Corporate Entity Against Multiple Respondents Including CIDCO and Private Individuals. Petition Pertains to Dispute Over Land or Property Rights Under Jurisdiction of Chief Land and Survey Officer.

17 Apr 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CIDCO's Appeal Against Quashing of Additional Lease Premium Demand. High Court's Direction to Issue 'No Dues Certificate' Set Aside as Respondent No.3 Failed to Establish Timely Completion of Construction.

6 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by City & Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) against the order of the Bombay Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land for Mosque, Upholds CIDCO's Decision. Allotment of plot for religious purpose is valid and not violative of secularism.

8 Aug 2014

The Petitioner, Tanzimul Muslimin Society Sanpada, was allotted a plot of land by CIDCO for setting up a mosque. The allotment was approved by CIDCO's...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

27 Sep 2019

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Lease Allotments for Alleged Non-Payment of Delayed Payment Charges. The Court Considered Whether Acceptance of Delayed Payments Without Protest Constituted Waiver of Delayed Payment Charges and Whether Cancellation of Allotments Was Justified.

28 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the cancellation of lease allotments by CIDCO for allegedly...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Stamp Duty Order in Seawoods Project Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a development agreement-cum-lease deed executed by CIDCO for a 60-year term is a lease, not a conveyance, and is chargeable under Article 36 of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Larsen and Toubro Ltd and its subsidiary, challenged an order dated 16 July 2011 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Retain Allotment Despite Delay in Payment of Lease Premium — Condonation of Delay Granted. Petitioner's failure to pay installments on time due to COVID-19 pandemic condoned, allotment restored on payment of interest and DPC.

19 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Narayani Trexim Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by CIDCO for lease of a plot in Sector 18, Vashi, Navi Mumbai. It was the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Land to Islamic Welfare Association for Mosque Construction — Petitioner Lacked Bonafides and Suppressed Material Facts. The court held that the petition was not maintainable as a Public Interest Litigation due to lack of bonafides and ulterior motives.

7 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Mr. Sumitra Krishna Kadu, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the lease of a plot of lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.

13 Feb 2018

The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)