Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land for Mosque, Upholds CIDCO's Decision. Allotment of plot for religious purpose is valid and not violative of secularism.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 58
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Tanzimul Muslimin Society Sanpada, was allotted a plot of land by CIDCO for setting up a mosque. The allotment was approved by CIDCO's Board in 2008 and by the State Government in 2012. The Petitioner challenged the allotment, but the court found no violation of secularism. The court held that the state can allot land for religious purposes as long as it is non-discriminatory. The petition was dismissed, and the allotment was upheld.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Secularism - Allotment of Land for Religious Purpose - Constitution of India, Articles 25, 26 - The court considered whether allotment of land by a government corporation for a mosque violates secularism. Held that secularism does not prohibit the state from allotting land for religious purposes, provided it is done without discrimination and in a fair manner. The allotment was upheld as valid. (Paras 1-10)

B) Property Law - Allotment of Land - Lease - City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (CIDCO) - The court examined the validity of a lease allotment for a religious institution. Held that the allotment was made after due approval by CIDCO's Board and State Government, and the petitioner had complied with conditions. The challenge by intervenors was dismissed. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the allotment of a plot of land by CIDCO to the Petitioner for setting up a mosque is valid and not violative of the principle of secularism.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was dismissed. The allotment of land for mosque was upheld.

Law Points

  • Allotment of land for religious purpose by a government corporation is permissible
  • Secularism does not prohibit state from allotting land for religious purposes
  • Non-discrimination principle applies
  • Article 25 and 26 of Constitution of India
  • Doctrine of secularism
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (08) 41

WRIT PETITION NO.1270 OF 2014

2014-08-08

A.S. Oka, A. S. Chandurkar

Mr. Shikur G. Kudle, Mr. Ganesh K. Sovani, Mr. Ashutosh M. Kulkarni, Mr. S.N. Patil

Tanzimul Muslimin Society Sanpada

The Managing Director and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging allotment of land for mosque.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the allotment of plot for mosque.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the allotment of land by CIDCO for setting up a mosque.

Issues

Whether the allotment of land for a mosque violates the principle of secularism.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that allotment of land for religious purpose is against secularism. Respondents argued that allotment is valid and non-discriminatory.

Ratio Decidendi

Secularism does not prohibit the state from allotting land for religious purposes, provided it is done without discrimination and in a fair manner.

Judgment Excerpts

By letter dated 7th August, 2012, the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (for short “CIDCO”) allotted a plot of land bearing 17A (for short “the said Plot”) admeasuring 699.97 square meters in Sector 8, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai to the Petitioner for setting up a mosque.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2014. By order dated 30th April 2014, parties were put to notice that the petition would be disposed of at the stage of admission. Only the first respondent filed a reply. The petition was heard and dismissed on 8th August 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 25, 26
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land for Mosque, Upholds CIDCO's Decision. Allotment of plot for religious purpose is valid and not violative of secularism.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Repurchase Not Enforceable. Receipt for Reconveyance Does Not Constitute a Valid Contract for Sale Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Suit Barre...