Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Declaration Dispute Based on Landlord's Admission. Landlord's admission of tenancy under Section 7-B of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is binding and cannot be ignored by appellate authorities.

The petitioner, Meenakshi M. Gurao, claimed to be a tenant of disputed land and applied to the Tahsildar, Guhagar, on 15-6-1988 under Section 7-B of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landlord's Challenge to MRT Order Granting Tenant Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Dispute Involves Agricultural Land Where MRT Overturned Concurrent Findings, Applying Deemed Tenancy Under Section 4 and Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The matter arose from a tenancy application filed by the respondent under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act Set Aside as Suit Land Not Trust Property on 1.4.1957.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 10.8.1998 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order on Tenancy Fixation. Tenancy Dispute Involving Mahar Watan Lands and Deemed Purchaser Status under Section 32-G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petition arose from a tenancy dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning agricultural lands in Dehugaon, Taluka...