Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

21646 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21646 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Jurisdiction Dispute — Private Agreement Cannot Oust Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court held that Clause 21 of the All India Chess Federation's Constitution, conferring exclusive jurisdiction on Chennai courts, cannot bar the Bombay High Court from entertaining a writ petition under Article 226.

29 Jul 2019

The present appeal arose from a dispute between the Maharashtra Chess Association (Appellant) and the All India Chess Federation (second Respondent), ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

21 Dec 2010

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

1 Jan 2026

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.

11 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners to Obtain Commission to Singapore Under Section 27 of Arbitration Act. Issuing Commission to Foreign Country Does Not Amount to Change of Venue of Arbitration.

8 Jun 2018

The petition was filed under section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the two petitioners, who were the original respondents in the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Answers Reference on Jurisdiction for Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Principal Civil Court of Original Jurisdiction is the Appropriate Forum. The Court held that applications under Section 29-A(4) lie before the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in the district, not the High Court, unless the High Court has ordinary original civil jurisdiction.

7 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court at Goa, in a reference made by a learned Single Judge, addressed the question of which court has jurisdiction to entertain an ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Applications Challenging Extended Detention of Accused in Counterfeit Stamp Scam under MCOCA. The Court examined the legality of the trial court's order permitting continued detention beyond 90 days for submission of final report in a case involving counterfeit revenue stamps and MCOCA provisions.

13 Apr 2005

The applicants, police officers Dattatraya Krishnaji Ghule and Hitendra Manohar Vichare, were arrested on 08-10-2004 in connection with RC.10/2004/EOU...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Revisionary Authority on Jurisdiction Ground. Cause of Action Arises at Place of Revisionary Authority's Office Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Not Where Original Adjudication Order Was Passed.

5 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court dealt with a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of six writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revision...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Contempt of Courts Act Provisions as Unconstitutional — Petitioner's Allegations of Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights Rejected. Court holds that Sections 2(c), 12, 14 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are not unconstitutional and that the contempt proceedings against the petitioner are not liable to be quashed.

4 May 2017

The petitioner, Satish Mahadeorao Uke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a dec...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)