Search Results for "Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules 1959"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Prisoner Despite Past Default in Surrender — Rule 4(10) of Prisons (Bombay Parole and Furlough) Rules, 1959 Held Not Mandatory. The court directed reconsideration of furlough application, emphasizing that a single default does not permanently bar furlough and the scheme's purpose of reformation must be upheld.

5 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Sanjay Madhukar Waghade, a prisoner convicted and serving sentence, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convicts' Emergency Parole Petition for Suppression of Facts and Misleading Statements. Petitioners convicted in 1996 Bombay Blast case sought emergency parole under Maharashtra Prisons Rules but suppressed material facts regarding their parole history and overstays.

19 Jun 2021

The petitioners, Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, were convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case, serving sentences for offences unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Furlough Rule Denying Furlough to Prisoners from Outside Maharashtra. Classification Based on Residence Held Reasonable Under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Petition for Emergency Parole Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Convict with Heart Condition Entitled to Emergency Parole Under Rule 19(1)(C)(ii) of Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 as He Surrendered on Time on Previous Occasions.

10 Jul 2020

The petitioner, Gajanan S/o Babulal Battulwar, a convict serving life imprisonment for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Convict in MCOCA Case on Ground of Spouse's Illness. Court Holds That Humanitarian Consideration Overrides Apprehension of Breach of Public Peace, Subject to Conditions.

26 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Arun s/o Gulab Gawli, a convict undergoing life imprisonment for offences under Sections 302, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict Despite Police Objection Based on Past Good Conduct. The court held that parole is a statutory right and rejection based on vague apprehension of absconding without material is unsustainable under Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules.

3 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Hariom Vijay Pande, a life convict undergoing imprisonment since 2010 for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to TADA Convicts Despite Past Overstay, Emphasizes Reformative Purpose of Prison Leave. Furlough is a right of a convict and cannot be denied solely on ground of previous late surrender without considering overall conduct and period of incarceration.

1 Mar 2018

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by life convicts under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict Despite Pending Appeal, Emphasizing Furlough as a Right. Rejection on Ground of Adverse Police Report Without Considering Conduct and Statutory Criteria Held Unsustainable Under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

13 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Dinesh Sahebrao Kadam, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the order dated 20th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convicts' Petitions for Premature Release Under Remission Rules - Remission Policy Must Be Applied Uniformly Without Arbitrary Distinctions Based on Nature of Offence. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 27-02-2009 does not exclude MCOCA convicts, and denial of remission solely on that ground is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

11 Nov 2014

The judgment concerns five criminal writ petitions filed by convicts seeking premature release under the remission policy of the State of Maharashtra....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Life Convict's Petition Seeking Retrospective Counting of Extended Furlough as Remission. Amended Rule 16 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, effective from 23rd April 2012, cannot be applied to furloughs granted prior to that date.

24 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Jagannath Raghunath Shelke, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 15th April ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)