Search Results for "BDA Layout Dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "BDA Layout Dispute"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Winding Up of Bangalore Development Authority for Non-Payment of Arbitral Award. Court holds that a statutory authority cannot be wound up under the Companies Act, 2013, and the remedy lies in execution of the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2019

The petitioner, IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Ltd. (formerly Maytas Infra Ltd.), a company engaged in infrastructure construction, had an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Hand Over Vacant Possession of Land Unauthorizedly Appropriated Without Acquisition — Senior Citizen's Land Used for Layout Formation Without Due Process. The Court held that the BDA's admission of unauthorized use of land without acquisition constituted a clear violation of the petitioner's right to property, and the BDA cannot be allowed to benefit from its own wrong.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India complaining against the callous and grossly cul...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions and Review Petitions in Land Acquisition Matter — Finds No Error in Order Declaring Lapse. Acquisition of Lands Deemed Lapsed Under Section 27 of BDA Act and Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Neither Award Nor Compensation Was Made Within Prescribed Period, Despite Society's and BDA's Contentions.

1 Mar 2019

The case involved a cluster of writ petitions and review petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging an order dated 15.07.2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Hand Over Vacant Possession of Land Unauthorizedly Appropriated Without Acquisition — Senior Citizen's Land Used for Layout Formation Without Due Process.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Owners' Appeals and Quashes Land Acquisition Notification Due to Non-Implementation of Scheme Over 32 Years. Non-utilization of 88% of Acquired Land and 23-Year Delay in Compensation Deposit Render Acquisition Proceedings Void Under BDA Act.

28 Oct 2015

The land owners owned property in Sy.No.4 of Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a preliminar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Not Made Within Two Years of Final Declaration. Failure to Comply with Mandatory Time Limit Under Section 11A Results in Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings for Land in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioner, K L Ramesh, claiming to be the owner of land measuring 3 acres 9 guntas in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Ba...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)