Search Results for "BDA Act, 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "BDA Act, 1976"

113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

High Court

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Order to Compensate Land Owner for Unauthorized Use. Court Rules That Taking Private Property Without Acquisition Proceedings Violates Constitutional Right Under Article 300-A.

5 Nov 2019

The case involved a dispute over private land owned by P.G. Belliappa, which was taken over by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) without any a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows PIL Challenging BDA's Deletion of Civic Amenity Land in Canara Bank Colony. BDA's Approval of Amended Layout Plan Reducing 16,000 Sq Ft Civic Amenity Site Quashed for Violating Statutory Requirements Under BDA Act and Zonal Regulations.

27 Sep 2019

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by the Canara Bank Colony Residents' Welfare Association under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, see...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Re-Hearing in PIL on Park Land Encroachment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Undertakings Recorded for Park Development and Slum Rehabilitation Under Karnataka Slum Areas Act; Review Petitions Allowed, Matter Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioner, a federation of residents' welfare associations, filed a public interest litigation in 2006 alleging encroachment on approximately 3 a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

9 Jan 2018

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Lapse of Land Acquisition by BDA; Petitioners Seek Declaration Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Citing Failure to Pay Compensation and Take Possession. The court considered whether non-payment of compensation and retention of land without utilization for layout constituted abandonment despite BDA's claim of possession taken and land earmarked for park.

18 Jul 2017

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court, clubbed together due to common ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

1 Jun 2015

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)