KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "Ahmedabad Small Causes Court"
76 result(s) found
Found 76 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Public Interest Litigation Seeking Phase-Out of Horse Carriages and Enforcement of Animal Welfare Laws. Petitioners Plead Violation of Article 51A(g) and Statutory Provisions; Respondents Acknowledge Licensing Deficiencies and Reduction in Victorias.
8 Jun 2015This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Animals and Birds Charitable Trust and others, highli...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.
30 Dec 2025The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contract Refund Dispute — Interest on Principal Not Payable from Date of Deposit When Contract Not Void or Breached. Gujarat Maritime Board Not Liable to Pay Interest for Period Before Abandonment of Contract Under Indian Contract Act, 1872.
24 Nov 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman, Gujarat Maritime Board, against the judgment of the Gujar...
- 225
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Trademark Infringement Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that mere existence of a website accessible in Mumbai does not confer jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 unless the plaintiff has a business or resides within the court's limits.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves two appeals (Appeal No.340 of 2015 and Appeal No.95 of 2015) heard together by the Bombay High Court. In the first appeal, the a...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Oct 2012The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...
- 201
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Magistrate to Implement SARFAESI Order for Bank Possession. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bound to Execute Section 14 Order for Taking Physical Possession of Secured Assets with Police Assistance.
10 Jun 2011The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company as defined in Clause 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, filed a criminal writ petit...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Impleadment in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Appellants Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Lessors Who Transferred Reversionary Interest Have No Subsisting Right to Be Impleaded in Dispute Between Lessee and Purchaser of Reversion.
27 Sep 2010The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court declining to implead the appellants under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Cod...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute Involving 'Ajanta' Toothpaste. The Court Examines Claims of Prior Use Where Plaintiffs Alleged Sales from June 2002 and Defendants from December 2002.
7 Mar 2006Background: The dispute concerned the use of the trade mark 'Ajanta' for toothpaste. The plaintiffs claimed to be prior users of the mark for non-medi...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Examines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts under MRTU Act Amidst Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents. The Court Considers Whether the Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Abhay Raj Jain Stands Impliedly Overruled by Nandram v. Garware Polyester Limited and Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd. for Determining Cause of Action in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints.
3 Nov 2025This judgment deals with a batch of appeals and writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay involving a common question of territoria...
- 13
