Search Results for "long delay"

4509 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4509 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Duty Demand Case Due to Inordinate Delay — 9-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Is Oppressive Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Eastern Agencies Aromatics (P) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition challenging a Show Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 396, 201, and 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Weak.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by five accused persons against their conviction by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural Distric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 56 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 set aside as live nexus between smuggling activity and detention order snapped by 10-month delay.

The petitioner, Farida Imram Chamundi, wife of the detenu, challenged a preventive detention order passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...