Search Results for "lease purpose"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "lease purpose"

2537 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2537 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Imposed by MUDA on Allottee for Violation of Natural Justice — Penalty Without Show Cause Notice Set Aside. Succession Rights Recognized and Authority Directed to Follow Due Process Before Imposing Penalty.

20 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Radhika Bhat, filed a writ petition challenging an endorsement dated 23-11-2016 issued by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Unaided Minority Schools Are Bound by 25% Admission Obligation Under RTE Act. The Court Examines if Land Grants or Nominal Lease Rents Constitute Government Aid Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

24 Dec 2013

The Bombay High Court was called upon to decide a clutch of writ petitions that raised a significant legal question concerning the applicability of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

6 Feb 2020

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

High Court

High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent

8 Aug 2024

The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petitions in JVPD Scheme Open Space Dispute — MHADA's Authority to Convert Garden Plots to Residential Use under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976 Addressed. Detailed Legal Issues Including Consent Terms and Maintainability of Appeal Not Decided.

19 Jul 2017

This common judgment deals with two writ petitions concerning the protection of open spaces in the Juhu Vile Parle Development Scheme (JVPD Scheme) at...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Nagpur Metro Appeal, Sets Aside High Court Order to Hand Over Possession of Land to Private Lessee. Metro Rail Project Land Allotment Upheld Subject to Outcome of Pending Civil Suit.

6 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited against the judgment of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Frivolous Writ Petitions Seeking Inclusion in Voters List as Abuse of Process. Petitioners Found to Have Filed Multiple Baseless Petitions with Suppression of Facts, Leading to Dismissal with Costs of Rs. 25,000.

21 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Pushpa B.R., Sanjeevmurthy, Karthik S Murthy, and Annapoorna B.S., filed four writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)