Search Results for "interest refund"

2384 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2384 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Local Body Tax Demand Due to Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Assessment Order Must Precede Demand Notice Under Section 33(7) of MMC Act, 1949.

The petitioner, M/s Hariom Sarees Depot, challenged an order dated 15 July 2013 passed by the Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, confirmi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Procurement Dispute — Refund of Rs.91 Lakhs Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Land Procurement Under MOU.

The petitioner, Manvel Tuscano, sole proprietor of M/s. Manvel Land Empire, and the respondent, DLF Limited, a real estate developer, entered into a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Case Due to 24-Year Delay in Adjudication. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 renders it stale and liable to be quashed as abuse of process.

The petitioners, Rachana Garments Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Kumar Bhartiya, challenged a show cause notice dated 27 June 1997 issued by the Co...