Search Results for "contract void"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "contract void"

1817 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1817 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Damages for Revenue Shortfall. The Award Found That the Business Centre Operator Failed to Make Endeavour to Achieve Revenue Projections in Business Plan Annexed to Management Agreement.

25 Nov 2025

This judgment of the Bombay High Court addressed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Regus South Mumbai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute, Holds That Allegations of Fraud Do Not Render Disputes Non-Arbitrable Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court sets aside Commercial Court order rejecting referral to arbitration, finding that fraud allegations must be directly related to arbitration agreement to oust jurisdiction.

28 Jul 2025

The case involves a commercial dispute between Pira Scientific (OPC) Pvt. Limited and others (appellants) and Novo Nordisk India Private Limited and a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

9 Mar 2005

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Mining Services Agreement Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Petitioner and Respondent. Court holds that a consortium agreement does not create privity of contract between the lead member and the employer, and the arbitration clause in the draft CMSA cannot be invoked before execution of the main agreement.

30 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Adani Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in High Seas Sales Dispute. Court Examines Whether Claim Based on Dishonoured Cheques Can Be Defeated by Ex Turpi Causa Defence Under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 Jan 2019

The dispute arose from high seas sales of raw materials and pharmaceutical drugs. The Respondent, as vendor, had filed a summary suit for recovery of ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Dismissed as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Time-Barred.

6 Mar 2015

The appellants, three sisters, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of the suit property claiming to be co-owners along with their broth...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Limitation and Res Judicata Cannot Be Decided Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Without Trial

6 Mar 2015

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Dismissed as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. Court holds that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when the averments in the plaint, if taken as true, disclose a cause of action and the suit is not barred by any law.

6 Mar 2015

The appellants, who are the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting of Supplier by Central Bank of India for Non-Supply Due to Force Majeure. Natural Calamity in Thailand Constitutes Force Majeure Excusing Performance Under Contract Law Principles.

6 Jul 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Acer India (Pvt.) Ltd., a private limited company engaged in supplying computer software and hardware, challenged its blacklistin...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)