Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

1165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Over Excess Payments and Blacklisting — Limitation Period Not Barred as Dispute Continued and Final Bill Not Rejected.

The case involves a dispute between Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board) and Saryu Plastics Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) regarding supply co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Section 9 Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration — Implied Party Finding Set Aside. Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pre-BALCO agreements, but non-signatory cannot be treated as implied party without express consent.

The petitioners, GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Limited and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21/08/2010 passed by the District Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Co-defendant in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Deletion of Party Ordered Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Co-defendant Against Whom No Relief Claimed is Not a Necessary Party.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a suit filed by Vidharbha Enterprises (plaintiff) against the Union of India and BSNL (...