Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

643 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 643 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Lecturers Challenging Termination by Unaided Private Engineering College. Termination of Probationers for Unsatisfactory Performance Does Not Amount to Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Is Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by lecturers (Sudhakar Shivaram Teke, Prof. S. S. Rayamane, and Udaykumar Govindrao Gurlhosur) agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Assured Career Progression Scheme Benefits to Forest Guard — Petitioner Entitled to ACPS from Date of Completion of 16 Years of Service as per Government Memorandum dated 22/2/2001. Denial of ACPS on ground of prior promotions held arbitrary and discriminatory.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath B. Desai, a Forest Guard employed by the State of Goa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSC and State Petitions Challenging MAT Order on Shortlisting Criteria for Director of Health Services. Recruitment Rules Mandate Consideration of All Eligible Candidates, Not Shortlisting.

The case involves a challenge by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) and the State of Maharashtra against an order of the Maharashtra Adm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preference for Direct Recruit Assistants Over Non-Graduate Promotees in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service. Rule Read Down to Exclude Graduate Promotees from Discrimination.

The case involves a dispute over the implementation of amended Rule 5(g) and Annexure-III item (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Arbitrary Revision of Seniority of Directors in Indian Postal Service for Violation of Article 16 of Constitution. Selective Promotion Not Based on Seniority and Revision Without Rule Held Discriminatory.

The petitioners, S. K. Ghosh and another, were promoted from Postal Superintendents Service Class II to the time scale of Class I Service in the India...