Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Promotion Claim in Agricultural University — Directs Consideration of Past Service for Associate Professor Eligibility. The Court held that temporary promotion based on merit under Statute 74 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Statutes, 1990, must be counted for eligibility to higher post when selection process was not completed within stipulated time.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Mirza Intekhab Akbar Baig, was appointed as a Junior Research Assistant on 30.05.2006 at Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. He was selected as Senior Research Assistant on 27.09.2007 and worked until 02.08.2011. On 03.08.2011, he was temporarily promoted as Assistant Professor for 11 months under Statute 74 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Statutes, 1990, based on seniority, merit, educational qualification, and annual confidential reports. He continued on the same post thereafter. In 2018, the University issued a permanent appointment order as Assistant Professor but did not count his service from 03.08.2011 to 21.06.2015. The petitioner sought directions to participate in the promotional process for Associate Professor by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court considered the factual matrix and the relevant statutes. The Court held that since the petitioner was temporarily promoted on merit and the University failed to complete the selection process within 11 months as per Statute 75, the petitioner's service from the date of temporary promotion should be counted for eligibility to the post of Associate Professor. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for promotion to Associate Professor by counting his service from 03.08.2011.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Promotion - Temporary Promotion - Regularisation - The petitioner was temporarily promoted as Assistant Professor for 11 months under Statute 74 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Statutes, 1990, and continued on the same post. The University later issued a permanent appointment order but did not count the service from 03.08.2011 to 21.06.2015. The Court held that the petitioner's service from the date of temporary promotion should be considered for eligibility to the post of Associate Professor, as the temporary promotion was based on merit and the University failed to complete the selection process within 11 months as per Statute 75. (Paras 3-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, who was temporarily promoted as Assistant Professor and later regularised, is entitled to count his service from the date of temporary promotion for eligibility to the post of Associate Professor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for promotion to the post of Associate Professor by counting his service from 03.08.2011.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Statute 74
  • Statute 75 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Statutes
  • 1990
  • Promotional benefits
  • Temporary promotion
  • Regularisation of service
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (04) 10

Writ Petition No. 8352 of 2020

2021-04-30

S.V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant D. Kulkarni

Mr. S.S. Thombre h/f Mr. P.D. Jarare for Petitioner, Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya for Respondent No.1, Mr. M.N. Navandar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3

Dr. Mirza Intekhab Akbar Baig

The State of Maharashtra, The Vice Chancellor, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, The Registrar, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to participate in the promotional process for the post of Associate Professor.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought directions to the respondents to consider his case for promotion to the post of Associate Professor by counting his service from the date of temporary promotion as Assistant Professor.

Filing Reason

The University issued a permanent appointment order as Assistant Professor but did not count the petitioner's service from 03.08.2011 to 21.06.2015, affecting his eligibility for promotion to Associate Professor.

Issues

Whether the petitioner's service from the date of temporary promotion (03.08.2011) should be counted for eligibility to the post of Associate Professor.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was temporarily promoted on merit and continued on the same post, and the University failed to complete the selection process within 11 months as per Statute 75, so his service from 03.08.2011 should be counted. Respondents argued that the petitioner's service prior to regularisation should not be counted for promotion.

Ratio Decidendi

When an employee is temporarily promoted on merit and continues on the same post due to the employer's failure to complete the selection process within the stipulated time, the service from the date of temporary promotion must be counted for eligibility to higher posts.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner an Assistant Professor is seeking directions to participate in the process of promotional post of Associate Professor by invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner was temporarily promoted as an Assistant Professor in the year 2011 and he continued on the same post from the year 2011.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 8352 of 2020 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The Court heard the matter and pronounced judgment on 30.04.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Statutes, 1990: Statute 74, Statute 75
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Promotion Claim in Agricultural University — Directs Consideration of Past Service for Associate Professor Eligibility. The Court held that temporary promotion based on merit under Statute 74 of the Ma...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act — No-Fault Liability Regime Precludes Defence of Deceased's Own Negligence. Claimants awarded Rs.8,15,000 with 8% interest for deat...