APPEAL No. 331 of 2012
18 Sep 2012The dispute centered on the shareholding of Gharda Chemicals Ltd., a closely held company originally belonging to the Gharda and Kavasmaneck families....
Search Results for "balance payment"
4913 result(s) found
Found 4913 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Land Acquired by BDA, Filed by Agreement Holder. Agreement Executed After Preliminary Notification Held Void; Suppression of Civil Suit and Lack of Title Preclude Compensation.
21 Jul 2025The petitioner, claiming to be an agreement holder in respect of certain lands notified for acquisition by the Bangalore Development Authority for the...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Rectification Deed for Excess Area — Holds Duty Payable Only on Actual Increase of 178.27 sq.mtrs. Not on Entire Amalgamated Area. The Court directed recalculation of stamp duty under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 on the actual increase of 178.27 sq.mtrs. over the original lease deed area.
4 Oct 2024The petitioners, Sukhraj B. Nahar Charitable Trust and Mr. Sukhraj B. Nahar, challenged an order dated 11 August 2015 passed by the Collector of Stamp...
- 811
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.
5 Jan 2023The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...
- 887
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Pledge Dispute Over Shares. Court Restrains Transfer of Pledged Shares and Orders Deposit of Surplus Sale Proceeds Pending Suit.
5 Feb 2014The Plaintiff, Pushpanjali Tip Up Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mrs. Renudevi Choudhary and others concerning shares pledged as security for loans. ...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Interim Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's power to pass interim award under Section 31(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for admitted liability of Rs.100 crores.
23 Jun 2016The petitioners, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and Mr. T. Venkatram Reddy, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Public Interest Litigations in Road Development Contract Dispute. Reiterates Stringent Locus Standi Requirements Under Article 226 to Prevent Abuse of Process by Meddlesome Bystanders.
14 Oct 2014The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of multiple public interest litigations and writ petitions concerning the Kolhapur Integrated Road ...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations Under Foreign Trade Policy — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by DGFT. The court quashed cancellation orders and directed fresh hearing, holding that quasi-judicial authorities must follow principles of natural justice before revoking licenses under the Foreign Trade Policy.
13 Jul 2018The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co. challengin...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations for Import of Areca Nuts — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Import of Areca Nuts under Advance Authorization Scheme for Export of Betel Nuts (Supari) Held Permissible Under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.
24 Jul 2018The petitioners, Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co., were granted advance authorizations under the F...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
29 Apr 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...
- 266
