Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Act"

702 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 702 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Delivers Judgment on Appeals Concerning Locus Standi of Third-Party Residents in Excise Licence Cases. Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition When Alternate Remedy Exists Under Bombay Prohibition (Closure of Licence) Order, 2003.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court in a writ petition filed by three local residents challenging the State G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Panshet Dam Rehabilitation — Land Acquisition Act Prevails Over Resettlement Act in Absence of Notification Under Section 11(1) of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sahebrao Gulabrao Dhamale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Based on Unregistered Will — Revenue Authorities Directed to Delete Entry and Restore Original Names. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Must Follow Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, thirteen residents of Ghatshendra, Kannad, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation of their names in the revenue records in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Requirements or Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, residents of Pernem, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for the construction of a road by the State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Co-operative Society for Lack of Notice Under Section 164 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds That Civil Suit Is Barred by Sections 91 and 163 of the Act as Disputes Relate to Society's Internal Management.

The plaintiffs, B.Y. Chavan and another, filed a suit against the Association of Tenants of the Bombay Catholic Housing Society and others, seeking re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...