Search Results for "Judicial officers"

4231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order Refusing Termination of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate. Appellant Failed to Demonstrate Bias or Justifiable Doubts Under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, a supplier of paper, entered into a contract with the respondent in 1993. Disputes arose regarding payment and quality of supply. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Judicial Officers in Constitutional Writ Seeking Elevation to High Court Bench. Ad-hoc Service as Fast Track Court Judges Does Not Qualify as Judicial Service Under Article 217(2)(a) of Constitution for Elevation Purposes, Following Precedent in Kum C. Yamini Case.

The petitioners, members of the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service, approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking relie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer. Governor is Appointing Authority Under Article 234 of Constitution, Overriding Service Rules.

The petitioner, Mrs. Geeta Ramesh Agrawal, was a judicial officer serving as a Metropolitan Magistrate. She was compulsorily retired by an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...