Search Results for "Gram Panchayat election"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of Kunabi Caste Claim for OBC Reservation. Petitioner failed to prove caste status and community acceptance, leading to disqualification from reserved Gram Panchayat seat.

The petitioner, Atul Tukaram Patil, contested the election for the post of Member of Gram Panchayat from ward no.6 of village Rashiwade, Taluka Radhan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Notice Issued by Tahsildar Without Proper Verification of Signatures and Without Giving Opportunity to Sarpanch to Explain Grounds.

The petitioner, Shri Raviraj Sambhajirao Nimbalkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kalnakwadi, Kolhapur. On 21st November 2017, some members...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of a Six-Year-Old Girl Under POCSO Act. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Pravin S/o Suryabhanji Gube, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 12.9.2018 in Special Child P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging DMA's Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 — Director of Municipal Administration Not Vested with Power to Remove Councillor for Misconduct.

The petitioner, Mr. Jervis Fernandes, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...